Afficher un message
 
Vieux 20/05/2023, 09h58
Avatar de Ohyeah
Ohyeah Ohyeah est déconnecté
Sage
 
Date d'inscription: aot 2016
Messages: 8 624
Par défaut

La réponse finale à ta question a en réalité déjà été répondue. Je viens de trouver des études à ce sujet.

People with disagreeable personalities (selfish, combative, and manipulative) do not have an advantage in pursuing power at work
Citation:
Does being disagreeable—that is, behaving in aggressive, selfish, and manipulative ways—help people attain power? This question has long captivated philosophers, scholars, and laypeople alike, and yet prior empirical findings have been inconclusive. In the current research, we conducted two preregistered prospective longitudinal studies in which we measured participants’ disagreeableness prior to entering the labor market and then assessed the power they attained in the context of their work organization ?14 y later when their professional careers had unfolded. Both studies found disagreeable individuals did not attain higher power as opposed to extraverted individuals who did gain higher power in their organizations. Furthermore, the null relationship between disagreeableness and power was not moderated by individual differences, such as gender or ethnicity, or by contextual variables, such as organizational culture. What can account for this null relationship? A close examination of behavior patterns in the workplace found that disagreeable individuals engaged in two distinct patterns of behavior that offset each other’s effects on power attainment: They engaged in more dominant-aggressive behavior, which positively predicted attaining higher power, but also engaged in less communal and generous behavior, which predicted attaining less power. These two effects, when combined, appeared to cancel each other out and led to a null correlation between disagreeableness and power.
Résumé : être un fdp n'aide pas à grimper les échelons du pouvoir (dark triad en pls)
les meilleurs indicateurs de réussite sont :
- extraversion (logique faut taper la discut aux gens)
- dominance (logique faut avoir la dégaine d'un leader)

ex : si t'es introverti et soumis, tu peux être le plus gros psychopathe de la planète, tu ne sera jamais PDG
si t'es extraverti et dominant, tu peux être l'homme le plus bienveillant de la planète, tu finiras PDG

Power, approach, and inhibition - PubMed
Citation:
This article examines how power influences behavior. Elevated power is associated with increased rewards and freedom and thereby activates approach-related tendencies. Reduced power is associated with increased threat, punishment, and social constraint and thereby activates inhibition-related tendencies. The authors derive predictions from recent theorizing about approach and inhibition and review relevant evidence. Specifically, power is associated with (a) positive affect, (b) attention to rewards, (c) automatic information processing, and (d) disinhibited behavior. In contrast, reduced power is associated with (a) negative affect; (b) attention to threat, punishment, others' interests, and those features of the self that are relevant to others' goals; (c) controlled information processing; and (d) inhibited social behavior. The potential moderators and consequences of these power-related behavioral patterns are discussed.
Résumé : le pouvoir transforme les gens en fdp (car plus de liberté et moins de punitions)

ex : macron étudiant était un mec normal (excepté le fait qu'il passait ses journées à se branler sur sa prof de théâtre ), mais une fois au pouvoir il est devenu un suppôt de satan

conclusion : si t'es un fdp, tu n'atteindras pas des hautes positions de pouvoir
par contre une fois que t'as atteint ces positions, là tu deviendras forcément un fdp
__________________
When the sun goes down, the racks go up, the lights turn on and the freaks come out.
Réponse avec citation