Sur un autre forum j'ai eu beaucoup d'avis masculins sur ce livre, mais là j'ai besoin d'avis féminins... Et honnêtes!
Je n'ai pas réussi à lire le bouquin en entier... Mais si vous voulez le lire voici un lien : dontmarry[point]files[point]wordpress[point]com/2008/08/the_manipulated_man[point]pdf
L'idée principale du bouquin est que les femmes ne sont pas oppréssée par les hommes comme l'affirment les féministes, mais exploitent le système construit afin de manipuler les hommes. Elles contrôlent les relations de couple afin de le trouner à leur avantage, sans que les hommes s'en apperçoivent.
Citation:
|
Envoyé par Esther Vilar
Men have been trained and conditioned by women, not unlike the way Pavlov conditioned his dogs, into becoming their slaves. As compensation for their labours men are given periodic use of a woman's vagina.
|
Citation:
|
Envoyé par Esther Vilar
Here is a list of issues which I recognised in the original book to be men's most significant disadvantages compared to women.
Men are conscripted; women are not.
Men are sent to fight in wars; women are not.
Men retire later than women (even though, due to their lower life-expectancy, they should have the right to retire earlier).
Men have almost no influence over their reproduction (for males, there is neither a pill nor abortion - they can only get the children women want them to have).
Men support women; women never, or only temporarily, support men.
Men work all their lives; women work only temporarily or not at all.
Even though men work all their lives, and women work only temporarily or not at all, on average, men are poorer than women.
Men only "borrow" their children; woman can keep them (as men work all their lives and women do not, men are automatically robbed of their children in cases of separation - with the reasoning that they have to work).
|
J'aimerai beaucoup savoir ce que vous en pensez, au moins en lisant l'article wikipédia (Wikipédia version anglaise > Esther Vilar) et le résumé de l'auteur ( theabsolute[point]net/misogyny/vilar[point]html ). Si vous pouvez essayez de le lire avec ouverture d'esprit et d'y réfléchir avant de répondre...
Merci si vous prenez le temps de faire ça.